<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress 3.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2010/01/27/wordpress-30/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2010/01/27/wordpress-30/</link>
	<description>Thoughts, rants, and even some code from the mind of Barney Boisvert.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 09:58:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: barneyb</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2010/01/27/wordpress-30/comment-page-1/#comment-207832</link>
		<dc:creator>barneyb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=1200#comment-207832</guid>
		<description>Frank,

While I understand your criticism, I&#039;m not sure how it applies.  MU isn&#039;t necessarily about administering a whole pile of blogs as a single unit, it&#039;s about serving a whole pile of blogs from a single codebase.  The MU architecture is about scalability (for wordpress.com) for a huge number of discrete blogs, not bulk-managing related blogs.  I&#039;ve not seen MU make any admin task harder than it would be if every individual blog was a separate WP.org installation, but it makes upgrades, backups, etc. enormously easier.

But the bottom line is that none of the problems you attribute to MU has are specific to MU&#039;s code.  Rather they&#039;re specific to MU&#039;s inherent use as a multihosting solution.  You&#039;d have all the same problems if you use WP.org to do multihosting, but without all the benefits of MU.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank,</p>
<p>While I understand your criticism, I'm not sure how it applies.  MU isn't necessarily about administering a whole pile of blogs as a single unit, it's about serving a whole pile of blogs from a single codebase.  The MU architecture is about scalability (for wordpress.com) for a huge number of discrete blogs, not bulk-managing related blogs.  I've not seen MU make any admin task harder than it would be if every individual blog was a separate WP.org installation, but it makes upgrades, backups, etc. enormously easier.</p>
<p>But the bottom line is that none of the problems you attribute to MU has are specific to MU's code.  Rather they're specific to MU's inherent use as a multihosting solution.  You'd have all the same problems if you use WP.org to do multihosting, but without all the benefits of MU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Thomas</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2010/01/27/wordpress-30/comment-page-1/#comment-207809</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=1200#comment-207809</guid>
		<description>Well, for one, I&quot;m not too excited about the Wordpress mu code merge. If you are wondering why, check out my post at: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usingwp.com/general-wordpress/wordpress-3-0-whats-troubling-me/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wordpress 3.0 - What&#039;s Troubling Me&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, for one, I"m not too excited about the Wordpress mu code merge. If you are wondering why, check out my post at: <a href="http://www.usingwp.com/general-wordpress/wordpress-3-0-whats-troubling-me/" rel="nofollow">Wordpress 3.0 &#8211; What's Troubling Me</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WordPress 3.0 &#124; Purple Hazard</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2010/01/27/wordpress-30/comment-page-1/#comment-206079</link>
		<dc:creator>WordPress 3.0 &#124; Purple Hazard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=1200#comment-206079</guid>
		<description>[...] WordPress 3.0 &#8211; A deeper look at the WordPress 3.0 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] WordPress 3.0 &#8211; A deeper look at the WordPress 3.0 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry, BikeTravellers.com</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2010/01/27/wordpress-30/comment-page-1/#comment-205089</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry, BikeTravellers.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 14:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=1200#comment-205089</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the write up. Does that mean you did not have to change httpd.conf and add wildcards as you need to do for WPMU (which I assume is a big hurdle for smaller WP isntallations on shared hosts etc)?

How does the server handle things now?
Cheers, Harry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the write up. Does that mean you did not have to change httpd.conf and add wildcards as you need to do for WPMU (which I assume is a big hurdle for smaller WP isntallations on shared hosts etc)?</p>
<p>How does the server handle things now?<br />
Cheers, Harry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juhani</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2010/01/27/wordpress-30/comment-page-1/#comment-203461</link>
		<dc:creator>Juhani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 07:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=1200#comment-203461</guid>
		<description>Hi!

Thanks a lot for the news. I&#039;ve been waiting for the code merge as well. The BuddyPress that is for now only for WPMU will be available for WP single and that opens new possibilities for the wordpress as a CMS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi!</p>
<p>Thanks a lot for the news. I've been waiting for the code merge as well. The BuddyPress that is for now only for WPMU will be available for WP single and that opens new possibilities for the wordpress as a CMS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
