<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ReversibleNamedMethodPointcutAdvisor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2009/07/22/reversible-named-method-pointcut-advisor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2009/07/22/reversible-named-method-pointcut-advisor/</link>
	<description>Thoughts, rants, and even some code from the mind of Barney Boisvert.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 09:58:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: barneyb</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2009/07/22/reversible-named-method-pointcut-advisor/comment-page-1/#comment-186280</link>
		<dc:creator>barneyb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=1029#comment-186280</guid>
		<description>Never mind.  Modern ColdSpring already has this functionality built in.  The app I was working on uses an older version (intentionally, mind you), that predates the addition into the core.  See update in the post above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never mind.  Modern ColdSpring already has this functionality built in.  The app I was working on uses an older version (intentionally, mind you), that predates the addition into the core.  See update in the post above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Allen</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2009/07/22/reversible-named-method-pointcut-advisor/comment-page-1/#comment-186273</link>
		<dc:creator>John Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=1029#comment-186273</guid>
		<description>LOVE IT! Great Idea. Now I have to do some refactoring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOVE IT! Great Idea. Now I have to do some refactoring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barneyb</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2009/07/22/reversible-named-method-pointcut-advisor/comment-page-1/#comment-186269</link>
		<dc:creator>barneyb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=1029#comment-186269</guid>
		<description>Tony,

No, that&#039;s usually the way I do it to apply transactionality to all my beans.  There are performance implications with proxying methods, particularly around the initial load (because of the filesystem/compiler churn), but it&#039;s snappy enough at runtime.

The particular case that drove this class was an app where every method is proxied for transactionality, but a single method on a single bean needed to be non-transactional (it manages it&#039;s transactions manually with CFTRANSACTION and a single method invocation encapsulates several distinct transactions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony,</p>
<p>No, that's usually the way I do it to apply transactionality to all my beans.  There are performance implications with proxying methods, particularly around the initial load (because of the filesystem/compiler churn), but it's snappy enough at runtime.</p>
<p>The particular case that drove this class was an app where every method is proxied for transactionality, but a single method on a single bean needed to be non-transactional (it manages it's transactions manually with CFTRANSACTION and a single method invocation encapsulates several distinct transactions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2009/07/22/reversible-named-method-pointcut-advisor/comment-page-1/#comment-186267</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=1029#comment-186267</guid>
		<description>Just curious, but is there much harm by using mappedNames * and proxying all the methods with the NamedMethodPointcutAdvisor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just curious, but is there much harm by using mappedNames * and proxying all the methods with the NamedMethodPointcutAdvisor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
