<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Æ’ÂµÂ©Òœ You WordPress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2009/04/17/screw-you-wordpress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2009/04/17/screw-you-wordpress/</link>
	<description>Thoughts, rants, and even some code from the mind of Barney Boisvert.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 09:58:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: WordPress MU - No Longer a Bare-Domain Nazi at BarneyBlog</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2009/04/17/screw-you-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-176371</link>
		<dc:creator>WordPress MU - No Longer a Bare-Domain Nazi at BarneyBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 04:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=848#comment-176371</guid>
		<description>[...] week or three ago I learned that WordPress MU was explicitly coded to refuse to run on a &#039;www&#039; subdomain, instead forcing you to run it on the bare domain.Â  While running your website on the bare domain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week or three ago I learned that WordPress MU was explicitly coded to refuse to run on a 'www' subdomain, instead forcing you to run it on the bare domain.Â  While running your website on the bare domain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2009/04/17/screw-you-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-174040</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 01:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=848#comment-174040</guid>
		<description>You should seriously give Drupal a try. It does multi-site hosting out of the box and a lot more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should seriously give Drupal a try. It does multi-site hosting out of the box and a lot more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle Richard</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2009/04/17/screw-you-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-173889</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 01:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=848#comment-173889</guid>
		<description>Barney, Your language!!!  What would your mother say?   :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barney, Your language!!!  What would your mother say?   :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Benningfield</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2009/04/17/screw-you-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-173871</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Benningfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 23:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=848#comment-173871</guid>
		<description>Barney: Step one... take a deep breath. :)

Okay, my first suggestion is to use blog.barneyb.com instead of www. That leaves www for a static HTML site or whatever you like. (You can 302 it for now, until you decide what to do.) 

You could also submit a ticket to Donncha and see if he&#039;s willing to add support for a canonical www in a future release. If he were to buy in, it might make it into 2.8... 2.7.1 is too close to release, I suspect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barney: Step one&#8230; take a deep breath. :)</p>
<p>Okay, my first suggestion is to use blog.barneyb.com instead of www. That leaves www for a static HTML site or whatever you like. (You can 302 it for now, until you decide what to do.) </p>
<p>You could also submit a ticket to Donncha and see if he's willing to add support for a canonical www in a future release. If he were to buy in, it might make it into 2.8&#8230; 2.7.1 is too close to release, I suspect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2009/04/17/screw-you-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-173739</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 06:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=848#comment-173739</guid>
		<description>Wow, that was a completely appropriate reaction :)

http://tinyurl.com/2axmuv

I actually hold the opposite view - http:// with www seems redundant to me.  However, I totally feel your pain when fighting with uncooperative software.

Wheeee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that was a completely appropriate reaction :)</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/2axmuv" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/2axmuv</a></p>
<p>I actually hold the opposite view &#8211; http:// with www seems redundant to me.  However, I totally feel your pain when fighting with uncooperative software.</p>
<p>Wheeee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
