Comments on: CFML and Groovy https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2008/06/20/cfml-and-groovy/ Thoughts, rants, and even some code from the mind of Barney Boisvert. Thu, 11 Sep 2014 09:58:12 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Kurt Wiersma https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2008/06/20/cfml-and-groovy/comment-page-1/#comment-98509 Kurt Wiersma Sat, 21 Jun 2008 20:12:11 +0000 http://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=427#comment-98509 I think #4 is the most appealing as well. Being able to edit a groovy script/class and run it without having to recompile/re-depoly your code is great advantage over java. The integration with Hibernate between groovy is neat, but I hear might be difficult to take advantage of through CF due to how CF works. I think #4 is the most appealing as well. Being able to edit a groovy script/class and run it without having to recompile/re-depoly your code is great advantage over java. The integration with Hibernate between groovy is neat, but I hear might be difficult to take advantage of through CF due to how CF works.

]]> By: Joe Rinehart https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2008/06/20/cfml-and-groovy/comment-page-1/#comment-98410 Joe Rinehart Sat, 21 Jun 2008 12:05:28 +0000 http://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=427#comment-98410 Yes. I am zero-indexed. (Seriously, yep, #4, that was a typo.) Yes. I am zero-indexed.

(Seriously, yep, #4, that was a typo.)

]]> By: barneyb https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2008/06/20/cfml-and-groovy/comment-page-1/#comment-98306 barneyb Sat, 21 Jun 2008 02:28:50 +0000 http://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=427#comment-98306 Joe, You meant #4, right? Joe,

You meant #4, right?

]]> By: Joe Rinehart https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2008/06/20/cfml-and-groovy/comment-page-1/#comment-98235 Joe Rinehart Fri, 20 Jun 2008 20:31:33 +0000 http://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=427#comment-98235 I'm leaning a lot towards #3 as well. I've found CFML the simplest way to define services that are exposed to multiple protocols without repeating myself...access="remote" making a SOAP service, AMF service, and (supposedly, never used it) Ajax service is just nice. As far as Grails is concerned, I've been in my hotel room trying to get it up and running again. IMHO, It's got too much convention built in to make its GORM really usable in a ColdFusion context, and I'm pretty ok managing Hibernate myself. I'm leaning a lot towards #3 as well.

I've found CFML the simplest way to define services that are exposed to multiple protocols without repeating myself…access="remote" making a SOAP service, AMF service, and (supposedly, never used it) Ajax service is just nice.

As far as Grails is concerned, I've been in my hotel room trying to get it up and running again. IMHO, It's got too much convention built in to make its GORM really usable in a ColdFusion context, and I'm pretty ok managing Hibernate myself.

]]>