Comments on: RequestMonitor.getRequestTimeout() https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2007/08/17/requestmonitorgetrequesttimeout/ Thoughts, rants, and even some code from the mind of Barney Boisvert. Thu, 11 Sep 2014 09:58:12 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Getting the current RequestTimeout » ghidinelli.com https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2007/08/17/requestmonitorgetrequesttimeout/comment-page-1/#comment-186256 Getting the current RequestTimeout » ghidinelli.com Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:00:14 +0000 http://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2007/08/17/requestmonitorgetrequesttimeout/#comment-186256 [...] card, it was reset down to just 300 seconds and so my batch processing would time out. Thanks to a clever but woefully named post by Barney Boisvert, getting the request timeout of the current context is super [...] [...] card, it was reset down to just 300 seconds and so my batch processing would time out. Thanks to a clever but woefully named post by Barney Boisvert, getting the request timeout of the current context is super [...]

]]> By: Ben Nadel https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2007/08/17/requestmonitorgetrequesttimeout/comment-page-1/#comment-30912 Ben Nadel Sun, 19 Aug 2007 17:42:49 +0000 http://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2007/08/17/requestmonitorgetrequesttimeout/#comment-30912 I am gonna include this in a post on monday. Thanks! I am gonna include this in a post on monday. Thanks!

]]> By: barneyb https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2007/08/17/requestmonitorgetrequesttimeout/comment-page-1/#comment-30628 barneyb Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:57:47 +0000 http://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2007/08/17/requestmonitorgetrequesttimeout/#comment-30628 Ben, Good call. Error handling a timeout error (specifically cleaning up in-use resources) is rather a pain, because almost any tag you run does a timeout check first, and so you can't do anything. But just extending the timeout by "a bit" would be a perfect way to get around it. Hadn't thought about that use case. Ben,

Good call. Error handling a timeout error (specifically cleaning up in-use resources) is rather a pain, because almost any tag you run does a timeout check first, and so you can't do anything. But just extending the timeout by "a bit" would be a perfect way to get around it. Hadn't thought about that use case.

]]> By: Ben Nadel https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2007/08/17/requestmonitorgetrequesttimeout/comment-page-1/#comment-30623 Ben Nadel Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:43:01 +0000 http://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2007/08/17/requestmonitorgetrequesttimeout/#comment-30623 Barney, this is wicked cool! This would totally jive well with my ideas on disaster recovery: http://www.bennadel.com/index.cfm?dax=blog:660.view There, I am randomly picking a new requesttimeout, but it would be so much better to actually have an existing time to work from. Thanks! Barney, this is wicked cool! This would totally jive well with my ideas on disaster recovery:

http://www.bennadel.com/index.cfm?dax=blog:660.view

There, I am randomly picking a new requesttimeout, but it would be so much better to actually have an existing time to work from. Thanks!

]]>