<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ColdFusion and Java</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2006/08/13/coldfusion-and-java/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2006/08/13/coldfusion-and-java/</link>
	<description>Thoughts, rants, and even some code from the mind of Barney Boisvert.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 09:58:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Ross</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2006/08/13/coldfusion-and-java/comment-page-1/#comment-387</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=176#comment-387</guid>
		<description>If it&#039;s any consolation for the CF&#039;er - I spent about 4 hours this saturday editing a JSF component&#039;s &quot;renderer&quot; implementation. After all was said and done I couldn&#039;t help but think about the simplicity of CF&#039;s custom tags.

To me CF vs. Java boils down mostly to the size &amp; type of the project (especially when there&#039;s existing code to levarage) and other environmental factors (skillsets, infrastructure, etc). Both have their place and it&#039;s obvious that the *right* way to do something is not language-specific.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it's any consolation for the CF'er &#8211; I spent about 4 hours this saturday editing a JSF component's "renderer" implementation. After all was said and done I couldn't help but think about the simplicity of CF's custom tags.</p>
<p>To me CF vs. Java boils down mostly to the size &amp; type of the project (especially when there's existing code to levarage) and other environmental factors (skillsets, infrastructure, etc). Both have their place and it's obvious that the *right* way to do something is not language-specific.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tanguyr</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2006/08/13/coldfusion-and-java/comment-page-1/#comment-386</link>
		<dc:creator>tanguyr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=176#comment-386</guid>
		<description>Hello Barney,

Given your choice of technologies (&quot;Spring, Hibernate, JUnit, and SpringMVC&quot;), you should take a look at the appfuse project (appfuse.org). I guess by now you&#039;re past the start up phase that appfuse is meant to help you with, but i&#039;m certain you&#039;d find a few interesting new ideas in the framework or the surrounding community (imho one of the highest signal to noise ratios around).

Regs,
/t</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Barney,</p>
<p>Given your choice of technologies ("Spring, Hibernate, JUnit, and SpringMVC"), you should take a look at the appfuse project (appfuse.org). I guess by now you're past the start up phase that appfuse is meant to help you with, but i'm certain you'd find a few interesting new ideas in the framework or the surrounding community (imho one of the highest signal to noise ratios around).</p>
<p>Regs,<br />
/t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gus</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2006/08/13/coldfusion-and-java/comment-page-1/#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>Gus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=176#comment-385</guid>
		<description>I always find the &quot;this is way to do things and everything else sucks&quot; arguments idiotic.

If one solution was truly superior in all cases, the others would fade away into oblivion. 

Gus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always find the "this is way to do things and everything else sucks" arguments idiotic.</p>
<p>If one solution was truly superior in all cases, the others would fade away into oblivion. </p>
<p>Gus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
