<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Debuggers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2006/08/01/debuggers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2006/08/01/debuggers/</link>
	<description>Thoughts, rants, and even some code from the mind of Barney Boisvert.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 09:58:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric Laney</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2006/08/01/debuggers/comment-page-1/#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Laney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=175#comment-384</guid>
		<description>I used the debugger constantly in the days of CF5, and I was heartstruck that ColdFusion MX didn&#039;t support it. I then had the opportunity to talk with the product manager for ColdFusion (both server and Studio). When I asked him about the possibility of a future debugger in ColdFusion MX, he simply said, &quot;well, we found that there just weren&#039;t that many people using the debugger.&quot;

Apparently, *I* was the one in the minority.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used the debugger constantly in the days of CF5, and I was heartstruck that ColdFusion MX didn't support it. I then had the opportunity to talk with the product manager for ColdFusion (both server and Studio). When I asked him about the possibility of a future debugger in ColdFusion MX, he simply said, "well, we found that there just weren't that many people using the debugger."</p>
<p>Apparently, *I* was the one in the minority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Nadel</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2006/08/01/debuggers/comment-page-1/#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Nadel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 15:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=175#comment-383</guid>
		<description>I have not gotten into CFLog and CFTrace much (and have not worked on HUGE projects) but I come from the mentality of &quot;code-a-bit, test-a-bit&quot;. I test things right when I build them and have a very methodical way of testing ranges of values in an attempt to break what I build. I don&#039;t know much about Unit testing but I think its basically a programatic way of doing what I do manually? 

But anyway, long and short of it is that I too do not feel the need for a debugger. As far as I am concerned CFDump pretty much solved most debugging problems I ever needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not gotten into CFLog and CFTrace much (and have not worked on HUGE projects) but I come from the mentality of "code-a-bit, test-a-bit". I test things right when I build them and have a very methodical way of testing ranges of values in an attempt to break what I build. I don't know much about Unit testing but I think its basically a programatic way of doing what I do manually? </p>
<p>But anyway, long and short of it is that I too do not feel the need for a debugger. As far as I am concerned CFDump pretty much solved most debugging problems I ever needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Schmitt</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2006/08/01/debuggers/comment-page-1/#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Schmitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 13:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=175#comment-382</guid>
		<description>I rarely used Studio&#039;s debugger. Now I generally have some sort of debugger in my CF apps that I can enable to dump some key data and the CF errors. The one place that I really find a debugger useful is with JavaScript. This is where Firefox and Firebug rock!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I rarely used Studio's debugger. Now I generally have some sort of debugger in my CF apps that I can enable to dump some key data and the CF errors. The one place that I really find a debugger useful is with JavaScript. This is where Firefox and Firebug rock!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Corfield</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2006/08/01/debuggers/comment-page-1/#comment-381</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Corfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=175#comment-381</guid>
		<description>p.s. cfcUnit with the ant task makes for a great automated harness for running unit tests :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>p.s. cfcUnit with the ant task makes for a great automated harness for running unit tests :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Corfield</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2006/08/01/debuggers/comment-page-1/#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Corfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=175#comment-380</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s so good to hear someone else who doesn&#039;t see the value in step-thru debuggers! I haven&#039;t used a source level debugger for... um... ten years at least, maybe longer than that...

Like you I found that using better test harnesses and, if necessary, instrumenting my code with logging (which can be externally configured on or off) meant I just stopped needing a debugger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's so good to hear someone else who doesn't see the value in step-thru debuggers! I haven't used a source level debugger for&#8230; um&#8230; ten years at least, maybe longer than that&#8230;</p>
<p>Like you I found that using better test harnesses and, if necessary, instrumenting my code with logging (which can be externally configured on or off) meant I just stopped needing a debugger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
