<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To BlogCFC or not to BlogCFC&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2006/04/04/to-blogcfc-or-not-to-blogcfc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2006/04/04/to-blogcfc-or-not-to-blogcfc/</link>
	<description>Thoughts, rants, and even some code from the mind of Barney Boisvert.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 09:58:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tuggle</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2006/04/04/to-blogcfc-or-not-to-blogcfc/comment-page-1/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuggle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 12:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=147#comment-306</guid>
		<description>I think your blog rocks as is. But I know upgrading is inevitable. Whatever you pick I hope you keep a similar look and feel. Your blog is somewhat unique and it stands out amist the other CF blogs. Nothing against Ray&#039;s product, but I can spot a BlogCFC blog a mile away.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your blog rocks as is. But I know upgrading is inevitable. Whatever you pick I hope you keep a similar look and feel. Your blog is somewhat unique and it stands out amist the other CF blogs. Nothing against Ray's product, but I can spot a BlogCFC blog a mile away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2006/04/04/to-blogcfc-or-not-to-blogcfc/comment-page-1/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2006 21:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=147#comment-305</guid>
		<description>Go with blogCFC. Point your users to Flickr.
Suggest ways to make anything reskinnable. (I am thinking Mr Myers colour blender to set up a pallette)

Maybe change the singleton to treat blogs like any other content?

(steal a few good ideas from farCry)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go with blogCFC. Point your users to Flickr.<br />
Suggest ways to make anything reskinnable. (I am thinking Mr Myers colour blender to set up a pallette)</p>
<p>Maybe change the singleton to treat blogs like any other content?</p>
<p>(steal a few good ideas from farCry)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2006/04/04/to-blogcfc-or-not-to-blogcfc/comment-page-1/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2006 23:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=147#comment-304</guid>
		<description>Asfusion.com are doing a blog app.

Got to be worth checking out (I am assuming it will use flash cfforms)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Asfusion.com are doing a blog app.</p>
<p>Got to be worth checking out (I am assuming it will use flash cfforms)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Tierney</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2006/04/04/to-blogcfc-or-not-to-blogcfc/comment-page-1/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Tierney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 15:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=147#comment-303</guid>
		<description>Barney, 
Wordpress seems to be the popular one outside the CF community, i have minor experience with it and 2.0 has some nice features including strong anti-spam measures built-in, rich editor, nice URL&#039;s and customizeable layout.  It&#039;s also extensible through a plugin architecture (my partner actually wrote the Structured blogging plugin for WP).  My roommate swears by Typo (http://www.typosphere.org/). I&#039;ve played with others including plog, pivot, nucleus and moveable type and in the end I went w/ BlogCFC for mine because it seemed the easiest to tweak given my background w/ CF.  I would have gone with Wordpress had I not used BlogCFC.

Sean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barney,<br />
Wordpress seems to be the popular one outside the CF community, i have minor experience with it and 2.0 has some nice features including strong anti-spam measures built-in, rich editor, nice URL's and customizeable layout.  It's also extensible through a plugin architecture (my partner actually wrote the Structured blogging plugin for WP).  My roommate swears by Typo (<a href="http://www.typosphere.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.typosphere.org/</a>). I've played with others including plog, pivot, nucleus and moveable type and in the end I went w/ BlogCFC for mine because it seemed the easiest to tweak given my background w/ CF.  I would have gone with Wordpress had I not used BlogCFC.</p>
<p>Sean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raymond Camden</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2006/04/04/to-blogcfc-or-not-to-blogcfc/comment-page-1/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond Camden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 11:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=147#comment-302</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m probably a bit biased, but I say go with BlogCFC. ;) Seriously, if you look into it, and decide against it, please let me know. I certainly will not be offended. Anything I can do to improve the product will help others as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm probably a bit biased, but I say go with BlogCFC. ;) Seriously, if you look into it, and decide against it, please let me know. I certainly will not be offended. Anything I can do to improve the product will help others as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doug sims</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2006/04/04/to-blogcfc-or-not-to-blogcfc/comment-page-1/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>doug sims</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 10:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=147#comment-301</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Dave, If you are looking for something that is extendable, farcry is where it is at. then when someone needs to add a podcast or some other new content type, you are working inside of a extenable framework, rather than just tacking something on top of blog software</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm with Dave, If you are looking for something that is extendable, farcry is where it is at. then when someone needs to add a podcast or some other new content type, you are working inside of a extenable framework, rather than just tacking something on top of blog software</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Ross</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2006/04/04/to-blogcfc-or-not-to-blogcfc/comment-page-1/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 08:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=147#comment-300</guid>
		<description>Use farcry. Its built-in &quot;news&quot; content type is about 98% of the way towards being a blog - plus the entire system is designed to be customized and extended. BlogCFC will always be tied to one big procedural singleton (not that that&#039;s terrible, but just not a good architecture for developer extension).

-Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use farcry. Its built-in "news" content type is about 98% of the way towards being a blog &#8211; plus the entire system is designed to be customized and extended. BlogCFC will always be tied to one big procedural singleton (not that that's terrible, but just not a good architecture for developer extension).</p>
<p>-Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea Veggiani</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2006/04/04/to-blogcfc-or-not-to-blogcfc/comment-page-1/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Veggiani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 05:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=147#comment-299</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m the creator so i&#039;m not super-partes, but keep a try to AVBlog (http://www.avblog.org).

And if you have questions feel free to write me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm the creator so i'm not super-partes, but keep a try to AVBlog (<a href="http://www.avblog.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.avblog.org</a>).</p>
<p>And if you have questions feel free to write me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2006/04/04/to-blogcfc-or-not-to-blogcfc/comment-page-1/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 03:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=147#comment-298</guid>
		<description>another vote for blogfusion. Jake&#039;s got a really kick ass app. I&#039;m anxiously awaiting V5, but 4 has totally rocked. I have two blogs, my wife, one all on blogfusion. very flexible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another vote for blogfusion. Jake's got a really kick ass app. I'm anxiously awaiting V5, but 4 has totally rocked. I have two blogs, my wife, one all on blogfusion. very flexible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sami Hoda</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2006/04/04/to-blogcfc-or-not-to-blogcfc/comment-page-1/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>Sami Hoda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 00:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=147#comment-297</guid>
		<description>MachBlog? (Coming Soon?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MachBlog? (Coming Soon?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
