<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Atomic Commits to Version Control</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2006/01/27/atomic-commits-to-version-control/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2006/01/27/atomic-commits-to-version-control/</link>
	<description>Thoughts, rants, and even some code from the mind of Barney Boisvert.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 09:58:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan G. Switzer, II</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2006/01/27/atomic-commits-to-version-control/comment-page-1/#comment-285</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan G. Switzer, II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=140#comment-285</guid>
		<description>Good points Barney. I also try to follow the atomic commit practice as well. Fortunately, I haven&#039;t had to rely on a rollback merge to undo a change, but it just seems to make sense to me to do commits once a feature/bug is fixed. 


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points Barney. I also try to follow the atomic commit practice as well. Fortunately, I haven't had to rely on a rollback merge to undo a change, but it just seems to make sense to me to do commits once a feature/bug is fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
