<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Damn the DevNet META Tag</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2005/12/10/damn-the-devnet-meta-tag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2005/12/10/damn-the-devnet-meta-tag/</link>
	<description>Thoughts, rants, and even some code from the mind of Barney Boisvert.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 09:58:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2005/12/10/damn-the-devnet-meta-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 23:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=135#comment-275</guid>
		<description>Just for the record, i mis-read the second post, thinking you said &quot;I don&#039;t care about legality I&#039;m going to use production servers serial numbers on our dev box.&quot;  In fact, you said the exact opposite.

 As such the first portion of my previous post is incorrect.  

 Anonymous Coward
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, i mis-read the second post, thinking you said "I don't care about legality I'm going to use production servers serial numbers on our dev box."  In fact, you said the exact opposite.</p>
<p> As such the first portion of my previous post is incorrect.  </p>
<p> Anonymous Coward</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barney</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2005/12/10/damn-the-devnet-meta-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>Barney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 18:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=135#comment-274</guid>
		<description>Anonymous Coward,

I bought DevNet such that my last renewal was very near the cutoff date.  I should say that this was far from the first time I ran into this problem.  Just happened to piss me off enough to finally yell at &quot;no one&quot;.

Regarding the legal issues, we&#039;ve since stopped using the DevNet server, and are in the process of rolling all of our applications off CF completely.   We should be almost totally CF-free by the end of the year.  It&#039;s simply ridiculous to spend more money on licenses for development servers than on production servers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymous Coward,</p>
<p>I bought DevNet such that my last renewal was very near the cutoff date.  I should say that this was far from the first time I ran into this problem.  Just happened to piss me off enough to finally yell at "no one".</p>
<p>Regarding the legal issues, we've since stopped using the DevNet server, and are in the process of rolling all of our applications off CF completely.   We should be almost totally CF-free by the end of the year.  It's simply ridiculous to spend more money on licenses for development servers than on production servers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2005/12/10/damn-the-devnet-meta-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 18:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=135#comment-273</guid>
		<description>I was doing some research on Devnet and came across this blog post.  

 I just want to say that, I find it ironic that you actually bought the software, but don&#039;t care about legality.  

 The devnet servers &#039;expired&#039; at the same time as your devnet subscription.  Unless you got (or renewed) a Devnet subscription very late in the game, your subscription was most likely expired at the time of this writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was doing some research on Devnet and came across this blog post.  </p>
<p> I just want to say that, I find it ironic that you actually bought the software, but don't care about legality.  </p>
<p> The devnet servers 'expired' at the same time as your devnet subscription.  Unless you got (or renewed) a Devnet subscription very late in the game, your subscription was most likely expired at the time of this writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barney</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2005/12/10/damn-the-devnet-meta-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>Barney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 23:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=135#comment-272</guid>
		<description>If I didn&#039;t care about legality, I&#039;d have skipped buying DevNet and just reused our production serial numbers.  Be legal, but encourage your vendors to not be stupid about their licensing, especially when they go back on their promises.  Regarding DevNet servers, the phrase &quot;fully functional&quot; is in there, even though CF7 is clearly not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I didn't care about legality, I'd have skipped buying DevNet and just reused our production serial numbers.  Be legal, but encourage your vendors to not be stupid about their licensing, especially when they go back on their promises.  Regarding DevNet servers, the phrase "fully functional" is in there, even though CF7 is clearly not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Auenson</title>
		<link>https://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2005/12/10/damn-the-devnet-meta-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Auenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 21:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=135#comment-271</guid>
		<description>There are some comments @ www.talkingtree.com/blog/index.cfm?mode=entry&amp;entry=80E120C1-50DA-0559-A0CE3D8628309982 that guide you on a way to remove the devnet tag... might not exactly be legal... YMMV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some comments @ <a href="http://www.talkingtree.com/blog/index.cfm?mode=entry&amp;entry=80E120C1-50DA-0559-A0CE3D8628309982" rel="nofollow">http://www.talkingtree.com/blog/index.cfm?mode=entry&amp;entry=80E120C1-50DA-0559-A0CE3D8628309982</a> that guide you on a way to remove the devnet tag&#8230; might not exactly be legal&#8230; YMMV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
