<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CFARGUMENT/CFPARAM and DEFAULT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2005/05/18/cfargumentcfparam-and-default/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2005/05/18/cfargumentcfparam-and-default/</link>
	<description>Thoughts, rants, and even some code from the mind of Barney Boisvert.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris P.</title>
		<link>http://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2005/05/18/cfargumentcfparam-and-default/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2005 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=90#comment-124</guid>
		<description>Kind of like: You should never use IIf() with a DE() that won't always validate.
But, kinda not.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kind of like: You should never use IIf() with a DE() that won't always validate.<br />
But, kinda not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barry.b</title>
		<link>http://www.barneyb.com/barneyblog/2005/05/18/cfargumentcfparam-and-default/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>barry.b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 23:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barneyb.com/barneyblog/?p=90#comment-123</guid>
		<description>thanx Barn..

- you're right - I didn't put it together like you just did and I've just taken them both at face value, not realising how inconsistant they were. 

I susect this is so interwoven into the language now that it's too late to change ... good catch 

cheers
barry.b</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanx Barn..</p>
<p>- you're right - I didn't put it together like you just did and I've just taken them both at face value, not realising how inconsistant they were. </p>
<p>I susect this is so interwoven into the language now that it's too late to change &#8230; good catch </p>
<p>cheers<br />
barry.b</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
